Дальномер

From: Raid W. Amin
Subject: Images Taken By 25 50mm Lenses
Date: 2007-01-03
I have finally completed by lens comparisons. This is the final overview of
what I have done:

I have tested/used the following lenses:

FSU:
1. J-3
2. J-8
3. Industrar 61L
4. Industrar 50mm/3.5 rigid
Japan:
5. Canon 50/1.2
6. Canon 50mm/1.4 ............... from Mark.
7. Canon 50mm/1.5 ............... from Mark.
8. Canon 50/1.8
9. Nikon 50/2
10. Nikkor S 50mm/1.4 (separate camera S2 and test) ............ from Kiu.
12. Nikkor Millenium 50mm/1.4 (for the S3) .............. from Kiu
13. Nikkor 50mm/1.1 ................. from Kiu
Germany:
14. Summicron rigid first version
15. Summicron Collapsible
16. Elmar 5cm/3.5
17. Zeiss Jena Sonnar 5cm/2 LTM
18. Summitar
19. Summarit
20. Zeiss Tessar 50mm/3.5 ........... from Mark
21. Zeiss Sonnar C 50mm/1.5 ......... from Fred
22. Zeiss Jena Sonnar 50mm/1.5 ...... from Fred
23. Noctilux 50mm/1.0 .......... from Fred
24. Prominent Nokton 50mm/1.5 .......... from Fred
25. Prominent Nokton 50mm/1.5 ........ from Mark

I may have gotten the names of the loaners mixed up, but they look right to me right now. You can find all links here.

1. B&W Focusing Test of Most 50mm Lenses in the Test:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=669440
2. Color Test of Lenses at 4.0
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=670650
3. Color Test of Lenses at 2.0
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=671321
4. Color Test of Lenses at 1.4-1.5
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=671339
5. Canon 50mm/0.95 on Canon 7s at 0.95
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder....lder_id=672398
6.Nikkor 50mm/1.4on Nikon S2
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=672453
7. Second Roll with the Canon 50mm/0.95
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=674636
8. Nikkor 50mm/1.1
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=679532
9. Nokton Prominent/Nikkor 50/1.4 for the S3/Zeiss Tessar 50mm/3.5
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=679553
10. Leitz Noctilux (hand-held)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=679571
11. Nokton Prominent LTM/Zeiss Jena 50mm/1.5/ Zeiss C-Sonnar
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=679915
Most images have been taken with Ilford XP2 Super C-41 B&W film, but I have also included a couple of color rolls.

I have just found out a possible error that should have affected the images for two lenses. I used the Nikon mount lenses on a Contax mount Bessa R2C without the Nikon-Contax adapter, except for the Nokton Prominent. I was unaware that the focusing on the two mounts would be different. This means that for 2 lenses in the last batch of lenses (Nikon Millenium, Zeiss Tessar), the results may get even better if I had used the Contax adapter. I mistakenly thought that only the Nokton [that came supplied with the adapter) needed the adapter. On the other hand, it may have been a lucky event with the Nikkor 50mm/1.1. It is supposed to be in Nikon mount, and I got only OOF results with it on the Nikon S2, but when using this lens on the Besaa R2C without the appropriate Contax adapter, the images were sharp. Either this lens was made for the Contax mount, or it needs reshimming and the mount difference provided the needed shimming for this lens.
There are only 3000 lenses made of the Nikkor 50mm/1.1, and I am fortunate to be able to get one as a loaner. The Noctilux is of course also an expensive and exotic lens of first class, and the Canon 50mm/0.95 is simply amazing.
There are many shortcomings in my lens testing/comparisons due to my style of testing. Not all factors are controlled, and human error plays a role. I used the M3 with the Noctilux wide open and I got sharper results than with the Bessa T [not posted]. I tried to use these lenses as I would use them in my own daily photography of my family.
I hope that some of you here will find some of the results useful for your own purposes and interests.

Raid

_________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/costo/

просто вспомнились душевные метания Северного Ветра в водовороте выбора best-ever-полтинника, подумал, что эта коллекция картинок может быть полезна, хотя бы для примерной оценки

_________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/costo/

спасибо Костя

Йопта! Leica glow! Я вижу Leica Glow!

_________________
Cон разума рождает квазитов

На всякий случай скопирую цитату чтоб потом не стёр и не говорил, что не видел

Костя, спасибо, правда, интересно

Интересные тесты.
Спасибо, Костя.

_________________
Welcome:
http://www.facebook.com/alexander.kondakov
kondakoff.livejournal.com/

Спасибо!

_________________
МОЛЬ

Спасибо Костя за инфу!
Сразу захотелось Ю-8 и Ю-3 прикупить, т.к. Кэнону и Никону они в этом тесте не проигрывают . По крайней мере на f4, а стоят три копейки.

... пока. Поэтому, кто не имеет - стоит поторопиться.

_________________
Жизнь - это то, что проходит мимо, пока ты строишь планы на будущее...

Во наживаются буржуи. А Ю-3 и Ю-8 очень даже ничего оказались! Аж ахнул от качество Ю-3 на дырку 1.5?

Вот спасибо! Хорошие ссылки, полезные. Я тут как-раз в задумчивочти по-поводу выбора буржуйской системы, так что в точку.